Then King David said to Ornan, “No, but I will surely buy it for the full price, for I will not take what is yours for the Lord, nor offer burnt offerings with that which costs me nothing.” (1 Chronicles 21:24)
Jerusalem suffered intensely under the plague as a result of David’s sin of acquiring a census. When David “saw the angel of the Lord standing between earth and heaven, having in his hand a drawn sword stretched out over Jerusalem” (1 Chronicles 21:16), he prayed to God for mercy. Therefore, the angel of the Lord told David to “erect and altar to the Lord on the threshing floor of Ornan the Jebusite (1 Chronicles 21:18), so that “the plague may be withdrawn from the people” (1 Chronicles 21:22).
In view of the national disaster that was sweeping the land, Ornan offered to give David the place of his threshing floor, along with oxen for burnt offerings, threshing implements for wood, and wheat for the grain offering. Ornan wanted relief form the plague as much as David did.
David could have just taken Ornan up at his offer. What’s wrong with accepting a free gift, if that gift would mean the end of the plague that was destroying Jerusalem? Ornan did not give away his threshing floor under compulsion. He wanted to give it away willingly, because he wanted the plague to end before his own life was consumed by it – just as any other Israelite would.
In fact, even if Ornan did not offer his threshing floor freely, David could use his authority to seize Ornan’s property, or just take it away from him. Who could deny a king of his wishes?
However, David would not hear of Ornan’s offer. David insisted on paying Ornan the full price for his threshing floor, and he “gave Ornan six hundred shekels of gold by weight for the place” (1 Chronicles 21:25). David understood the meaning of making an offering to the Lord. He knew that an offering would be meaningless if it costed him nothing. He took the right course of action. God accepted his offering and “answered him from heaven by fire on the altar of burnt offering” (1 Chronicles 21:26).
When David had a choice to choose his punishment, he chose the easiest way. But when David had a choice to make an offering to atone for his sins, he chose the proper way – even if it was the harder way.
One may reason that the price that David paid for Ornan’s threshing floor is only miniscule compared to the vast wealth of his treasuries. Paying 600 shekels of gold is nothing big for a king!
However, the point here is not so much about the ratio of the offering to the amount that David is able to offer. David’s offering pleased the Lord because it was done in a proper way. David’s attitude of offering a sacrifice at his own cost made it acceptable unto the Lord.
An offering is considered a sacrifice, only if it came at a cost of the offerer. Our sincerity in our service and in our giving to the Lord is reflected in the way it costs us. If it costs us nothing, it means nothing to God.
Sunday, October 30, 2005
Saturday, October 29, 2005
The Punisher
“Thus says the Lord: ‘Choose for yourself, either three years of famine, or three months to be defeated by your foes with the sword of your enemies overtaking you, or else for three days the sword of the Lord – the plague in the land, with the angel of the Lord destroying throughout all the territory of Israel’…” (1 Chronicles 21:11-12)
Gad, David’s seer, brought God’s word of punishment to David for his sin of acquiring a census. David must have considered all the 3 options given to him, so he could choose the punishment that he deemed as the lightest.
1st option: 3 years of famine. A great agricultural disaster will come upon the land. People will go hungry. The land will be in an economical crisis when the produce of the land is crippled. Poverty will drive people to desperation. Crime rate will increase, and this will cause a rise of social problems.
2nd option: 3 months of military defeat. Israel will face 3 months of solid onslaught from its enemies. And in every battle, Israel will face defeat. Countless lives of valiant men will be lost. Families will become destitute with the loss of their husbands and sons. A family line may be totally cut off with a sudden death of its males. Israel’s military might will suddenly be as vulnerable as a chick without its mother hen. David’s pride as a legendary man of war will be badly damaged.
3rd option: 3 days of plague in the land. A disaster will be brought upon Jerusalem by “the sword of the Lord.” 72 hours of intense destruction will be carried out swiftly by “the angel of the Lord.” People will die tragically and indiscriminately by the hand of an unstoppable, unexplainable, divine power.
Of the 3 options given to David, he chose the 3rd option. But why did he choose that option? Wouldn’t it be the most terrifying and painful thing to accept punishment from an immortal, all-powerful God? Surely His anger will be impossible to bear. Wouldn’t it be easier to accept punishment that would be dished out from the hands of mortal men? Surely David still had his head screwed on his shoulder while making this informed decision!
But David knew what he was doing. He said “Please let me fall into the hand of the Lord, for His mercies are very great; but do not let me fall into the hand of man”(1 Chronicles 21:13).
Of course, David made the most logical choice when he chose what he deemed to be the easiest punishment to endure. Such great faith that David had in the Lord, that he believed in the mercies of God, even in the pronouncement of certain judgment! David knew that even in His wrath, there is a side of God who “is ever merciful” (Psalms 37:26). He entrusted his own life and the welfare of his nation to the mercies of God, rather than to the hands of man.
Imagine if you had done something terribly wrong, and you were actually offered a choice to choose your own punishment. Who would you choose as your punisher?
Gad, David’s seer, brought God’s word of punishment to David for his sin of acquiring a census. David must have considered all the 3 options given to him, so he could choose the punishment that he deemed as the lightest.
1st option: 3 years of famine. A great agricultural disaster will come upon the land. People will go hungry. The land will be in an economical crisis when the produce of the land is crippled. Poverty will drive people to desperation. Crime rate will increase, and this will cause a rise of social problems.
2nd option: 3 months of military defeat. Israel will face 3 months of solid onslaught from its enemies. And in every battle, Israel will face defeat. Countless lives of valiant men will be lost. Families will become destitute with the loss of their husbands and sons. A family line may be totally cut off with a sudden death of its males. Israel’s military might will suddenly be as vulnerable as a chick without its mother hen. David’s pride as a legendary man of war will be badly damaged.
3rd option: 3 days of plague in the land. A disaster will be brought upon Jerusalem by “the sword of the Lord.” 72 hours of intense destruction will be carried out swiftly by “the angel of the Lord.” People will die tragically and indiscriminately by the hand of an unstoppable, unexplainable, divine power.
Of the 3 options given to David, he chose the 3rd option. But why did he choose that option? Wouldn’t it be the most terrifying and painful thing to accept punishment from an immortal, all-powerful God? Surely His anger will be impossible to bear. Wouldn’t it be easier to accept punishment that would be dished out from the hands of mortal men? Surely David still had his head screwed on his shoulder while making this informed decision!
But David knew what he was doing. He said “Please let me fall into the hand of the Lord, for His mercies are very great; but do not let me fall into the hand of man”(1 Chronicles 21:13).
Of course, David made the most logical choice when he chose what he deemed to be the easiest punishment to endure. Such great faith that David had in the Lord, that he believed in the mercies of God, even in the pronouncement of certain judgment! David knew that even in His wrath, there is a side of God who “is ever merciful” (Psalms 37:26). He entrusted his own life and the welfare of his nation to the mercies of God, rather than to the hands of man.
Imagine if you had done something terribly wrong, and you were actually offered a choice to choose your own punishment. Who would you choose as your punisher?
Friday, October 28, 2005
Bad Call
So David said to Joab and to the leaders of the people, “Go, number Israel from Beersheba to Dan, and bring the number of them to me that I may know it.” And Joab answered, “May the Lord make His people a hundred times more than they are. But, my lord the king, are they not all my lord’s servants? Why then does my lord require this thing? Why should he be a cause of guilt in Israel?” (1 Chronicles 21:2-3)
Why was it wrong for David to call for a census? How come Joab advised David against it, saying that it would cause him to be “a cause of guilt in Israel?”
The act of having a census was not wrong in itself. We saw how God Himself had commanded the Israelites to be counted during an earlier time of Israel’s history, when He said “Take a census of all the congregation of the children of Israel…” (Numbers 1:2).
However, David’s motive behind the act of calling for a census had caused him to sin against God. His attitude and the purpose behind the census was the cause of wrong. David wanted to know how many Israelites he had who were able to draw the sword, so he could glory in the extent of his reign. All the while, God has been behind all of David’s victories in battle. But now, David’s pride has moved him to rely on something more “tangible” – a statistic of his military strength. He may have intended to use the number of his standing army in a rhetoric manner to amplify or exaggerate his military prowess, forgetting that the battle had always belonged to the Lord.
Israel was a theocratic nation. Instead of relying on God’s protective care and His divine providence, David has shifted his trust towards his own military strength. Having a census may have been David’s first step to prepare for a military draft. It seemed that God’s plan for Israel was to have a citizen army, rather than a large standing army, so that Israel would trust in the Lord for His deliverance in their battles.
Joab has proved himself to be more prudent than David during this instance. However, “the king’s word prevailed against Joab” (1 Chronicles 21:4), although “the king’s word was abominable to Joab” (1 Chronicles 21:6).
This story comes as an important reminder to us. Sometimes, our subordinate may be wiser in advising us against our follies. It takes a humble attitude to listen and take heed to a person who may be younger, newer, or of a lower status. If only David had listened to Joab, he would not have sinned or brought great affliction to his people. The Israelites were greatly punished because of the king’s misdeed.
Why was it wrong for David to call for a census? How come Joab advised David against it, saying that it would cause him to be “a cause of guilt in Israel?”
The act of having a census was not wrong in itself. We saw how God Himself had commanded the Israelites to be counted during an earlier time of Israel’s history, when He said “Take a census of all the congregation of the children of Israel…” (Numbers 1:2).
However, David’s motive behind the act of calling for a census had caused him to sin against God. His attitude and the purpose behind the census was the cause of wrong. David wanted to know how many Israelites he had who were able to draw the sword, so he could glory in the extent of his reign. All the while, God has been behind all of David’s victories in battle. But now, David’s pride has moved him to rely on something more “tangible” – a statistic of his military strength. He may have intended to use the number of his standing army in a rhetoric manner to amplify or exaggerate his military prowess, forgetting that the battle had always belonged to the Lord.
Israel was a theocratic nation. Instead of relying on God’s protective care and His divine providence, David has shifted his trust towards his own military strength. Having a census may have been David’s first step to prepare for a military draft. It seemed that God’s plan for Israel was to have a citizen army, rather than a large standing army, so that Israel would trust in the Lord for His deliverance in their battles.
Joab has proved himself to be more prudent than David during this instance. However, “the king’s word prevailed against Joab” (1 Chronicles 21:4), although “the king’s word was abominable to Joab” (1 Chronicles 21:6).
This story comes as an important reminder to us. Sometimes, our subordinate may be wiser in advising us against our follies. It takes a humble attitude to listen and take heed to a person who may be younger, newer, or of a lower status. If only David had listened to Joab, he would not have sinned or brought great affliction to his people. The Israelites were greatly punished because of the king’s misdeed.
Thursday, October 27, 2005
Who Did It?
Now Satan stood up against Israel, and moved David to number Israel (1 Chronicles 21:1).
When David called for a census of Israel and Judah, “God was displeased with this thing” (1 Chronicles 21:7). And Israel was greatly punished because of this. A cross reference on a parallel passage revealed something weird:
Again the anger of the Lord was aroused against Israel, and He moved David against them to say, “Go, number Israel and Judah” (2 Samuel 24:1).
So who moved David to number Israel and Judah? Satan or God? Why is there such a stark contradiction?
The apparent contradiction can be resolved by recognizing that though Satan is the author of all evil, he cannot exercise his evil intentions apart from the permission of God. Moreover, God could use Satan to accomplish His own purposes of judgment or discipline. Like it or not, even though Satan is God’s biggest adversary, and as much as he wants to rebel against God, he still ends up as a “servant of God” in a way.
A few examples of how Satan was used a God’s agent for judgment. In His judgment, God purposed to punish Ahab unto death. And He carried out His judgment through an evil spirit:
Micaiah said ‘I saw the Lord sitting on His throne… And the Lord said, ‘Who will persuade Ahab to go up, that he may fall at Ramoth Gilead?’… Then a spirit came forward and stood before the Lord, and said, ‘I will persuade him… I will go out and be a lying spirit in the mouth of all his prophets.’ And the Lord said, ‘You shall persuade him, and also prevail. Go out and do so.’ (1 Kings 22:19-22)
In God's judgment against Ahab, He carried out His judgment through an evil spirit. True enough, Ahab was deceived by the false prophets and he was killed at Ramoth Gilead. Isn’t it strange? It’s as though God used an evil spirit to lie to Ahab, because God Himself is incapable of lying. How come God could be so “democratic” with the fallen angels, to the extent that they could have discussions together about how best to carry out His judgment? Check out this other example where God had a counsel meeting with His fallen subjects:
Now there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the Lord, and Satan also came among them. And the Lord said to Satan, “From where do you come?” So Satan answered the Lord and said, “From walking to and fro on the earth, and from walking back and forth on it” (Job 1:6-7)
And from there, the subject of Job was brought up. We’re all familiar about how God allowed Satan to test Job through intense inflicting suffering on him. Isn’t it strange, how Satan could have access to stand before a holy God? And isn’t it also equally weird how God could have such cordial conversations with Satan, asking him where he has been?
Satan is still featured as God’s agent of punishment, even in the New Testament. In carrying out church discipline against a sexually immoral brother, Paul writes: “Deliver such a one to Satan for destruction of the flesh, that his spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord Jesus” (1 Corinthians 5:5).
As mysterious as it sounds, in the end of the day, God still accomplishes His purposes in His sovereignty. On our part, we should be wary not to find ourselves in the path of God’s wrath. For God is so powerful, it is unimaginable what He is capable of doing.
When David called for a census of Israel and Judah, “God was displeased with this thing” (1 Chronicles 21:7). And Israel was greatly punished because of this. A cross reference on a parallel passage revealed something weird:
Again the anger of the Lord was aroused against Israel, and He moved David against them to say, “Go, number Israel and Judah” (2 Samuel 24:1).
So who moved David to number Israel and Judah? Satan or God? Why is there such a stark contradiction?
The apparent contradiction can be resolved by recognizing that though Satan is the author of all evil, he cannot exercise his evil intentions apart from the permission of God. Moreover, God could use Satan to accomplish His own purposes of judgment or discipline. Like it or not, even though Satan is God’s biggest adversary, and as much as he wants to rebel against God, he still ends up as a “servant of God” in a way.
A few examples of how Satan was used a God’s agent for judgment. In His judgment, God purposed to punish Ahab unto death. And He carried out His judgment through an evil spirit:
Micaiah said ‘I saw the Lord sitting on His throne… And the Lord said, ‘Who will persuade Ahab to go up, that he may fall at Ramoth Gilead?’… Then a spirit came forward and stood before the Lord, and said, ‘I will persuade him… I will go out and be a lying spirit in the mouth of all his prophets.’ And the Lord said, ‘You shall persuade him, and also prevail. Go out and do so.’ (1 Kings 22:19-22)
In God's judgment against Ahab, He carried out His judgment through an evil spirit. True enough, Ahab was deceived by the false prophets and he was killed at Ramoth Gilead. Isn’t it strange? It’s as though God used an evil spirit to lie to Ahab, because God Himself is incapable of lying. How come God could be so “democratic” with the fallen angels, to the extent that they could have discussions together about how best to carry out His judgment? Check out this other example where God had a counsel meeting with His fallen subjects:
Now there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the Lord, and Satan also came among them. And the Lord said to Satan, “From where do you come?” So Satan answered the Lord and said, “From walking to and fro on the earth, and from walking back and forth on it” (Job 1:6-7)
And from there, the subject of Job was brought up. We’re all familiar about how God allowed Satan to test Job through intense inflicting suffering on him. Isn’t it strange, how Satan could have access to stand before a holy God? And isn’t it also equally weird how God could have such cordial conversations with Satan, asking him where he has been?
Satan is still featured as God’s agent of punishment, even in the New Testament. In carrying out church discipline against a sexually immoral brother, Paul writes: “Deliver such a one to Satan for destruction of the flesh, that his spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord Jesus” (1 Corinthians 5:5).
As mysterious as it sounds, in the end of the day, God still accomplishes His purposes in His sovereignty. On our part, we should be wary not to find ourselves in the path of God’s wrath. For God is so powerful, it is unimaginable what He is capable of doing.
Wednesday, October 26, 2005
Bible Writers Don't Know Math
All Israel had one million one hundred thousand men who drew the sword, and Judah had four hundred and seventy thousand men who drew the sword (1 Chronicles 21:5).
David called for a census to number Israel, much to the dismay of Joab. Nevertheless, the job was done, and the result: 1,100,000 men in Israel, and 470,000 men in Judah. Coming across as a shock to our belief in the inerrancy of Scriptures is the discrepancy of these numbers, cross-referenced in 2 Samuel:
And there were in Israel eight hundred thousand valiant men who drew the sword, and the men of Judah were five hundred thousand men (2 Samuel 24:9).
According to 2 Samuel, Israel had 800,000 men – 300,000 men less than what was recorded by the chronicler! Also, 2 Samuel records that Judah had 500,000 men – 30,000 men more than the chronicler’s head count! How can this be? An error as big as the thousands does not augur well for the Bible’s much acclaimed reputation for its accuracy.
In fact, this is just one instance in the bible where the numbers don’t add up. There are many more discrepancies of this nature that occur many places elsewhere. There has got to be an answer to this puzzle. What exactly is the problem with numbers?
There are a few ways of interpreting these large numbers without denying the authority and accuracy of Scriptures. There are 3 ways of looking at numbers in the bible:
Firstly, the numbers can be taken as exact. This way of interpreting numbers stands in a majority of bible passages, where the amount is neither challenged nor fluctuated in parallel passages. But this explanation does not answer the chronicler’s inconsistency.
Secondly, the fluctuations can be attributed to a scribal error. There could be an early misunderstanding of the Hebrew word that is usually translated into thousands. Unfortunately, this point of view does not hold much water, because the original text with its exact arithmetic does not show any evidence of scribal errors.
Thirdly, the most plausible way to interpret those numbers is to accept the fact that there is more than 1 way to use numbers. With this understanding, numbers can be seen in 3 different ways:
1) The numbers can be precise, such as “three-tenths of an ephah of fine flour” (Numbers 15:9).
2) The numbers can be approximated, such as “about a day’s journey” (Numbers 11:31).
3) The numbers can be used in a rhetorical manner, where deliberate exaggeration is intentional for effect, such as “If Cain shall be avenged sevenfold, then Lamech seventy-sevenfold” (Genesis 4:24). Moses clearly used the rhetoric manner when he proclaimed: “The Lord your God has multiplied you, and here you are today, as the stars of heaven in multitude. May the Lord God of your fathers make you a thousand times more numerous than you are, and bless you as He has promised you!” (Deuteronomy 1:10-11).
Therefore, large numbers in the bible may have its origins from a combination of those 3 uses. The numbers may have started off as a precise statistic. Then, the numbers may have been approximated by rounding them to the nearest hundred. Then, the numbers may have been inflated (by a factor of 10, perhaps) in a rhetorical manner to evoke praise to God, just as Moses did.
As for Joab’s count of “men who drew the sword” in 1 Chronicles and “valiant men who drew the sword” in 2 Samuel, probably the numbers were not used in a rhetorical manner. The numbers were very unlikely to be inflated because the statistics were for the purpose of governance.
It is likely that the men in 1 Chronicles and 2 Samuel were numbered according to different standards. It may be speculated that different criteria were used to consider a man as able-bodied enough to be counted as military quality. At this point, the numbers started off as precise.
After that, the numbers in both cases were obviously approximated, as they are clearly rounded numbers. They must have been rounded off to the nearest hundred. Or to the nearest thousand, whichever seemed fit to the scribes.
In the conclusion of the matter, the “inconsistency” of numbers in the bible does not degrade its authority or reliability as the divine and inspired Word of God. The statistics in the bible are subject to the weakness of human interpretation. Nevertheless, the message content of the bible stands infallible.
Monday, October 24, 2005
Times Of War And Peace
Is not the Lord your God with you? And has He not given you rest on every side? For He has given the inhabitants of the land into my hand, and the land is subdued before the Lord and before His people. Now set your heart and your soul to seek the Lord your God (1 Chronicles 22:18-19).
Those were the words that David spoke to the leaders of Israel to help his son, Solomon to build the temple. God’s people were enjoying a time of peace from their enemies, for He has “given (them) rest on every side.” During those times when they were free from the fear and aggression of war, David exhorted his people: “Set your heart and your soul to seek the Lord your God,” and “arise to build the sanctuary of the Lord God” (1 Chronicles 22:19).
David did not have a chance to build the Lord’s temple during his reign, because his kingship was an era of war and conquest. There was neither time nor opportunity for the temple of the Lord to be built, while the land was still in the midst of tumultuous wars and the unsettling expansions. And when David’s kingdom finally found rest, it was about time for Solomon to take over his throne. Hence, David advised his son to build the Lord’s sanctuary while the timing is ripe with opportunity.
Now that my practical training at Methodist Boys’ School has ended, my semester is spared from exams this time around. While my other friends are slogging during the study week, and bogged down by the pressures and anxieties of exams that looms precariously over them, I have a lot of time and autonomy in my hands to do what I want to do and go where I want to go.
Thus, I am taking this time to set my heart and my soul to seek the Lord my God. It is not every time when I get to be temporarily released from the necessary evils of life. I am taking this opportunity to read and write. To dwell more on God’s word, seek Him with my mind, and please him with my soul. I intend to harness this precious time that I have to grow in Him and be a blessing to others – something that I have not had the luxury of doing for a long time.
Hence, I’ve been coming to the library almost everyday, spending long hours there, just reading the bible and writing, while I see people around me struggling in their war with their books. I’m also taking the time to meet up with people, and spend more time with them.
It is indeed a pleasurable experience to set my heart and my soul to seek the Lord. During these times of peace, the I am now spared from waging tumultuous wars, and my plans for vigorous expansions are put on hold. With the grace of God, I hope that during these peaceful times, I will find a time of restoration, rebuilding, strengthening, and equipping. So that when it is time to wage war again, I will be ready.
The Lord is to be sought at all times, be it in war or peace. However, the Lord is gracious, and He knows our shortcomings when we fail to truly enthrone Him as Lord of our lives in the midst of war. Therefore, when the Lord puts His hedge of protection around you and grants you peace, don’t let that chance pass you by. For the Lord knows that we need a breather. He knows that we need Him.
Those were the words that David spoke to the leaders of Israel to help his son, Solomon to build the temple. God’s people were enjoying a time of peace from their enemies, for He has “given (them) rest on every side.” During those times when they were free from the fear and aggression of war, David exhorted his people: “Set your heart and your soul to seek the Lord your God,” and “arise to build the sanctuary of the Lord God” (1 Chronicles 22:19).
David did not have a chance to build the Lord’s temple during his reign, because his kingship was an era of war and conquest. There was neither time nor opportunity for the temple of the Lord to be built, while the land was still in the midst of tumultuous wars and the unsettling expansions. And when David’s kingdom finally found rest, it was about time for Solomon to take over his throne. Hence, David advised his son to build the Lord’s sanctuary while the timing is ripe with opportunity.
Now that my practical training at Methodist Boys’ School has ended, my semester is spared from exams this time around. While my other friends are slogging during the study week, and bogged down by the pressures and anxieties of exams that looms precariously over them, I have a lot of time and autonomy in my hands to do what I want to do and go where I want to go.
Thus, I am taking this time to set my heart and my soul to seek the Lord my God. It is not every time when I get to be temporarily released from the necessary evils of life. I am taking this opportunity to read and write. To dwell more on God’s word, seek Him with my mind, and please him with my soul. I intend to harness this precious time that I have to grow in Him and be a blessing to others – something that I have not had the luxury of doing for a long time.
Hence, I’ve been coming to the library almost everyday, spending long hours there, just reading the bible and writing, while I see people around me struggling in their war with their books. I’m also taking the time to meet up with people, and spend more time with them.
It is indeed a pleasurable experience to set my heart and my soul to seek the Lord. During these times of peace, the I am now spared from waging tumultuous wars, and my plans for vigorous expansions are put on hold. With the grace of God, I hope that during these peaceful times, I will find a time of restoration, rebuilding, strengthening, and equipping. So that when it is time to wage war again, I will be ready.
The Lord is to be sought at all times, be it in war or peace. However, the Lord is gracious, and He knows our shortcomings when we fail to truly enthrone Him as Lord of our lives in the midst of war. Therefore, when the Lord puts His hedge of protection around you and grants you peace, don’t let that chance pass you by. For the Lord knows that we need a breather. He knows that we need Him.
Friday, October 21, 2005
Building My House
Furthermore I tell you that the Lord will build you a house. And it shall be, when your days are fulfilled, when you must go to be with your fathers, that I will set up your seed after you, who will be of your sons; and I will establish his kingdom. He shall build Me a house, and I will establish his throne forever (1 Chronicles 17:10-12)
David expressed his desire to build a house for the Lord. But God responded in a surprising manner. God said that He does not have an immediate need for a house to dwell in, because He never “dwelt in a house since the time that (He) brought up Israel” (1 Chronicles 17:5). In fact, God has never demanded or asked the judges of Israel “Why have you not built Me a house of cedar?” (1 Chronicles 17:6)
However, in return for David’s thoughtful gesture, God blessed David greatly by saying that he will build David a house. He promised David a continuation of his royal dynasty. God also promised that after David’s death, He will set up his son’s kingdom after him. That son will be Solomon. Solomon’s kingdom will be established forever. The eternal establishment of his kingdom will be made possible by the coming reign of the Lord Jesus Christ, who will come from David’s line. And Solomon will have the privilege of building a house for the Lord.
How great is the blessing that God has granted to David!
I’m sure we have given some thought about building our own “house.” How are we going to establish our own “kingdom”? We may have certain goals in our lives – to have our own “castle” firmly built by a certain age. Hopefully at not too late a time, so we can still have time to enjoy what we have built. I’m certain we’ve also wondered whether or not what we’ve set out to establish will have a good continuation from our own seed.
I just came back from a mountain-conquering expedition. Mount Kinabalu, the highest peak in South-east Asia. During the long and arduous climb, I had a lot of time to think about things. Things pertaining to life. Even after my descent from the mount, I still reflect a lot about it.
I realize I am a man of great ambition. I have an innate addiction for challenges. It may be a good thing, and it also may be a bad thing. As much as it is applaudable to thrive on challenges, the need to live on challenges may also sidetrack a person from what he is supposedly called to do.
I realize I may be wanting too much in life. Upon my descent from the mount, I’m already thinking of climbing every mountain in Asia. I’m already wishing that when I start working, I want to accumulate enough money to conquer all those peaks by age 30.
Besides the thrills and spills one can get in life, I also think about how I can build my own “castle” and establish my own “kingdom”. I’m considering all the options I can possibly take en route to securing my “house” while I still have breath. I also wish that my seed will continue what I have set up with my sweat and toil. There is so much that I plan to do. So much that I hope to achieve.
I may have a serious problem with the word “surrender”. I may not like the idea that certain things, like my own life, cannot be under my control.
In my drive home to Penang, someone asked me this question: “Are you ready to meet your Maker? Have you ever thought about it?” That question stuck with me for a long time. More often than not, I think my answer is no.
Being preoccupied with building our own kingdom can really throw us off course from what we are meant to do while we’re still on this earth. Why am I so caught up about my own kingdom? What about God’s kingdom?
David chose to build God’s house first. In return, God Himself built David’s house for him.
David expressed his desire to build a house for the Lord. But God responded in a surprising manner. God said that He does not have an immediate need for a house to dwell in, because He never “dwelt in a house since the time that (He) brought up Israel” (1 Chronicles 17:5). In fact, God has never demanded or asked the judges of Israel “Why have you not built Me a house of cedar?” (1 Chronicles 17:6)
However, in return for David’s thoughtful gesture, God blessed David greatly by saying that he will build David a house. He promised David a continuation of his royal dynasty. God also promised that after David’s death, He will set up his son’s kingdom after him. That son will be Solomon. Solomon’s kingdom will be established forever. The eternal establishment of his kingdom will be made possible by the coming reign of the Lord Jesus Christ, who will come from David’s line. And Solomon will have the privilege of building a house for the Lord.
How great is the blessing that God has granted to David!
I’m sure we have given some thought about building our own “house.” How are we going to establish our own “kingdom”? We may have certain goals in our lives – to have our own “castle” firmly built by a certain age. Hopefully at not too late a time, so we can still have time to enjoy what we have built. I’m certain we’ve also wondered whether or not what we’ve set out to establish will have a good continuation from our own seed.
I just came back from a mountain-conquering expedition. Mount Kinabalu, the highest peak in South-east Asia. During the long and arduous climb, I had a lot of time to think about things. Things pertaining to life. Even after my descent from the mount, I still reflect a lot about it.
I realize I am a man of great ambition. I have an innate addiction for challenges. It may be a good thing, and it also may be a bad thing. As much as it is applaudable to thrive on challenges, the need to live on challenges may also sidetrack a person from what he is supposedly called to do.
I realize I may be wanting too much in life. Upon my descent from the mount, I’m already thinking of climbing every mountain in Asia. I’m already wishing that when I start working, I want to accumulate enough money to conquer all those peaks by age 30.
Besides the thrills and spills one can get in life, I also think about how I can build my own “castle” and establish my own “kingdom”. I’m considering all the options I can possibly take en route to securing my “house” while I still have breath. I also wish that my seed will continue what I have set up with my sweat and toil. There is so much that I plan to do. So much that I hope to achieve.
I may have a serious problem with the word “surrender”. I may not like the idea that certain things, like my own life, cannot be under my control.
In my drive home to Penang, someone asked me this question: “Are you ready to meet your Maker? Have you ever thought about it?” That question stuck with me for a long time. More often than not, I think my answer is no.
Being preoccupied with building our own kingdom can really throw us off course from what we are meant to do while we’re still on this earth. Why am I so caught up about my own kingdom? What about God’s kingdom?
David chose to build God’s house first. In return, God Himself built David’s house for him.
Thursday, October 13, 2005
Jewish Boy Band
And these are the ones who ministered with their sons:... Heman the singer, the son of Joel… And his brother Asaph, who stood at his right hand, was Asaph the son of Berachiah… on the left hand, were Ethan the son of Kishi… (1 Chronicles 6:31-48)
David appointed men over the “service of song”, to minister “with music before the dwelling place of the tabernacle of meeting.” 3 names were mentioned as the main stars.
Introducing, the first of its kind... An internationally acclaimed boy band who hails from the Middle-east... Who puts British boy bands like 911 to shame… Give it up, for... The greatest Jewish boy band ever... 777!!
Let me introduce to you the members of this band. The lead singer is Heman. This is not Heman, Master Of The Universe. This is Heman, son of Joel. (Billy Joel, perhaps?) He must be an outstanding singer to be called “Heman the singer.” His amazing vocals must have been given to him by God’s special gifting... Hopefully not by the powers of Greyskull!
In his service of song, Heman is accompanied by 2 more men – Asaph and Ethan. Heman, Asaph and Ethan always stand in a customized formation for every performance before the tabernacle. Heman stands in the center, flanked by Asaph on his right, and Ethan on his left… Much to the disdain of She-Ra, who was hoping so much to be included into their video clip!
Later in 1 Chronicles 15, when the Ark was brought to Jerusalem, the 3 superstars were called up again for their services. This time, they were allowed to include background musicians to help them in their music-making exploits. Also, “Chenaniah, leader of the Levites,” was appointed as “instructor in charge of the music, because he was skillful” (1 Chronicles 15:22). With Chenaniah as the boy band’s new producer, 777’s records must have reached Platinum by Passover!
You must be wondering what kind of instruments they played. 777 makes their music to the accompaniment of stringed instruments, harps, trumpets, and horns. As for Heman, Asaph and Ethan, they played the cymbals. Back then, cymbals were used to lead musicians, instead of the modern drum set or electric guitars.
777 shot to fame because they were the first band to incorporate a special element into their music. Because of the ingenuity of that special element, 777 became a widely influential band, taking the music industry to new heights, crossing boundaries of time and space by storm! Although 777 began making its debut before the Gregorian calendar existed, 777’s special element has inspired the birth of new, controversial genres in the late 20th century. Those genres are known today as alternative and heavy metal!
This special element is called “raising the voice” (1 Chronicles 15:16) and “shouting” (1 Chronicles 15:28). Of course, most alternative and heavy metal bands did not quite get the “shouting” part right. After many generations, the “raising the voice” has evolved to “screaming at the top of your lungs”.
Today’s entry is mixed with cartoon humour and rock history. Meant to be taken lightly, after many heavy postings in the last few entries.
David appointed men over the “service of song”, to minister “with music before the dwelling place of the tabernacle of meeting.” 3 names were mentioned as the main stars.
Introducing, the first of its kind... An internationally acclaimed boy band who hails from the Middle-east... Who puts British boy bands like 911 to shame… Give it up, for... The greatest Jewish boy band ever... 777!!
Let me introduce to you the members of this band. The lead singer is Heman. This is not Heman, Master Of The Universe. This is Heman, son of Joel. (Billy Joel, perhaps?) He must be an outstanding singer to be called “Heman the singer.” His amazing vocals must have been given to him by God’s special gifting... Hopefully not by the powers of Greyskull!
In his service of song, Heman is accompanied by 2 more men – Asaph and Ethan. Heman, Asaph and Ethan always stand in a customized formation for every performance before the tabernacle. Heman stands in the center, flanked by Asaph on his right, and Ethan on his left… Much to the disdain of She-Ra, who was hoping so much to be included into their video clip!
Later in 1 Chronicles 15, when the Ark was brought to Jerusalem, the 3 superstars were called up again for their services. This time, they were allowed to include background musicians to help them in their music-making exploits. Also, “Chenaniah, leader of the Levites,” was appointed as “instructor in charge of the music, because he was skillful” (1 Chronicles 15:22). With Chenaniah as the boy band’s new producer, 777’s records must have reached Platinum by Passover!
You must be wondering what kind of instruments they played. 777 makes their music to the accompaniment of stringed instruments, harps, trumpets, and horns. As for Heman, Asaph and Ethan, they played the cymbals. Back then, cymbals were used to lead musicians, instead of the modern drum set or electric guitars.
777 shot to fame because they were the first band to incorporate a special element into their music. Because of the ingenuity of that special element, 777 became a widely influential band, taking the music industry to new heights, crossing boundaries of time and space by storm! Although 777 began making its debut before the Gregorian calendar existed, 777’s special element has inspired the birth of new, controversial genres in the late 20th century. Those genres are known today as alternative and heavy metal!
This special element is called “raising the voice” (1 Chronicles 15:16) and “shouting” (1 Chronicles 15:28). Of course, most alternative and heavy metal bands did not quite get the “shouting” part right. After many generations, the “raising the voice” has evolved to “screaming at the top of your lungs”.
Today’s entry is mixed with cartoon humour and rock history. Meant to be taken lightly, after many heavy postings in the last few entries.
Wednesday, October 12, 2005
A Displaced Genealogy
Now the sons of Reuben the firstborn of Israel – he was indeed the firstborn, but because he defiled his father’s bed, his birthright was given to the sons of Joseph, the son of Israel, so that the genealogy is not listed according to the birthright (1 Chronicles 5:1).
Interestingly, the chronicler did not list the genealogy of Jacob’s sons according to its chronological order. By right, the firstborn son should have his genealogy mentioned first, before all his brothers. Reuben was Jacob’s firstborn son. But he had his genealogy listed after Judah and Simeon’s genealogies. Why did the chronicler mention Judah’s genealogy first before all the other sons of Jacob, but not Reuben’s? There are probably for 2 reasons for that:
Firstly, it is because of the purpose of 1 Chronicles. 1 Chronicles was written to emphasize the Israelite’s continuity with their past when they returned from captivity. In order to remind the Israelites of their great heritage, the Israelites were encouraged by the thought that God would establish His reign upon the earth through David’s royal line. Therefore, 1 Chronicles focuses on the glories of David’s reign. And David came from the line of Judah. The chronicler emphasized Judah’s lineage by mentioning that “Judah prevailed over his brothers, and from him came a ruler” (1 Chronicles 5:2). Consistent with that statement, the chronicler listed Judah’s genealogy before the rest.
Secondly, Reuben’s sin against his father was underscored by the way the chronicler recorded Reuben’s genealogy. In an attempt to assert his right to be the principal heir to succeed his father, “Reuben went and lay with Bilhah his father’s concubine” (Genesis 35:22). Because Reuben “defiled his father’s bed”, his genealogy was “not listed according to the birthright”.
Not only did Reuben's genealogy get “dethroned” among the sons of Jacob. By his misdeed, he also forfeited his birthright that he so desired to have. Jacob gave the birthright to Joseph’s sons, Ephraim and Manasseh, instead of giving it to Reuben. Jacob laid his hands on Ephraim and Manasseh, and said “Bless the lads; Let my name be named upon them, and the name of my fathers Abraham and Isaac; And let them grow into a multitude in the midst of the earth” (Genesis 48:17).
So, what is the moral of the story? The moral of the story here is not to encourage an obsession about genealogies. The bible teaches us not to “give heed to fables and endless genealogies, which cause disputes rather than godly edification which is in faith” (1 Timothy 1:4). Rather, the real point here is to point out the ramifications of being over-zealous, or wanting something too much. Reuben’s obsession of getting his birthright, which is probably fuelled by his own insecurities, has led him to commit a misdeed that not only made him lose the very thing that he wanted so much, but also the superiority of his genealogy in the way it was listed among the sons of Jacob.
Interestingly, the chronicler did not list the genealogy of Jacob’s sons according to its chronological order. By right, the firstborn son should have his genealogy mentioned first, before all his brothers. Reuben was Jacob’s firstborn son. But he had his genealogy listed after Judah and Simeon’s genealogies. Why did the chronicler mention Judah’s genealogy first before all the other sons of Jacob, but not Reuben’s? There are probably for 2 reasons for that:
Firstly, it is because of the purpose of 1 Chronicles. 1 Chronicles was written to emphasize the Israelite’s continuity with their past when they returned from captivity. In order to remind the Israelites of their great heritage, the Israelites were encouraged by the thought that God would establish His reign upon the earth through David’s royal line. Therefore, 1 Chronicles focuses on the glories of David’s reign. And David came from the line of Judah. The chronicler emphasized Judah’s lineage by mentioning that “Judah prevailed over his brothers, and from him came a ruler” (1 Chronicles 5:2). Consistent with that statement, the chronicler listed Judah’s genealogy before the rest.
Secondly, Reuben’s sin against his father was underscored by the way the chronicler recorded Reuben’s genealogy. In an attempt to assert his right to be the principal heir to succeed his father, “Reuben went and lay with Bilhah his father’s concubine” (Genesis 35:22). Because Reuben “defiled his father’s bed”, his genealogy was “not listed according to the birthright”.
Not only did Reuben's genealogy get “dethroned” among the sons of Jacob. By his misdeed, he also forfeited his birthright that he so desired to have. Jacob gave the birthright to Joseph’s sons, Ephraim and Manasseh, instead of giving it to Reuben. Jacob laid his hands on Ephraim and Manasseh, and said “Bless the lads; Let my name be named upon them, and the name of my fathers Abraham and Isaac; And let them grow into a multitude in the midst of the earth” (Genesis 48:17).
So, what is the moral of the story? The moral of the story here is not to encourage an obsession about genealogies. The bible teaches us not to “give heed to fables and endless genealogies, which cause disputes rather than godly edification which is in faith” (1 Timothy 1:4). Rather, the real point here is to point out the ramifications of being over-zealous, or wanting something too much. Reuben’s obsession of getting his birthright, which is probably fuelled by his own insecurities, has led him to commit a misdeed that not only made him lose the very thing that he wanted so much, but also the superiority of his genealogy in the way it was listed among the sons of Jacob.
Monday, October 10, 2005
Prayer Of Jabez
Now Jabez was more honorable than his brothers, and his mother called his name Jabez, saying “Because I bore him in pain.” And Jabez called on the God of Israel saying, “Oh, that You would bless me indeed, and enlarge my territory, that Your hand would be with me, that You would keep me from evil, that I may not cause pain!” So God granted him what he requested (1 Chronicles 4:9-10).
This particular prayer is famously known as the Prayer Of Jabez. Books have been written about this prayer. It has been endorsed by many people, taught in many places, and it has spread everywhere. But I personally feel that all the hype surrounding this prayer is uncalled for.
The Prayer Of Jabez probably seemed special because it is found in the middle of the geneology of the family of Judah. I believe people have assigned a lot of value to this prayer because of its simplicity, and also because of its location. The exhilaration of finding such a prayer in such an unlikely place has led people to put undue emphasis on it. Who wouldn’t be pleasantly surprised to find a breath of fresh air in the midst of a book which is as boring as 1 Chronicles? The effect of discovering such a portion of Scriptures is akin to unearthing a treasure chest in the midst of a desert.
However, the question is, as much as the Prayer Of Jabez looks like a special prayer that was recorded in an unexpected place, is the amount of attention given to it justifiable? Have we over-amplified the effect of stumbling upon a couple of verses in the bible, to the extent of misinterpreting the real context in which the prayer was said?
If the Prayer Of Jabez was anything that special, I can unearth many other prayers in the Bible that can be of greater value or significance.
The Lord’s Prayer (Matthew 6:9-13). Isn’t that how Jesus taught us to pray? I’m sure this model prayer is superior to that of Jabez’s prayer. It is a good “mould” or “template” that can be used as a guide to help us to pray.
Check out Jesus’ prayer (John 17:6-26). Imagine the kind of good it will bring to all believers worldwide if everyone were to say this prayer on a daily basis. One may argue that only Jesus could say that prayer, because it was said by Him, and nobody can repeat His prayer and claim it as his own. If that is true, then the same goes for the Prayer Of Jabez, doesn’t it?
What about The Prayer Of Solomon? (1 Kings 3:6-9). At the utterance of that prayer, God gave Solomon a “wise and understanding heart”, and “both riches and honor”, which will be unparalleled by anyone that came before him or will come after him. Solomon was also granted long life. Who wouldn’t want to be blessed like that? Imagine the kinds of books that can be written about this prayer. “Prayer Of Solomon For Adults”. “Prayer Of Solomon For Teens”. “Prayer Of Solomon For Kids”.
Solomon’s father came out with outstanding prayers in the Psalms. David’s prayers have an additional poetic effect to it. His prayers can even be sung along to a tune, for easy memorization. Perhaps a music CD can be made to teach the Prayers Of David to the masses?
How can we overlook the Prayer Of Paul (Ephesians 1:16-19). If only we exemplified the exact prayer that Paul prayed regularly for all the saints. What a great blessing it will be for our brothers and sisters everywhere if we take Paul’s Prayer on par with the Prayer Of Jabez!
Let’s get back to what prayer really is. Prayer is about conversing directly with God, which is made possible by Jesus Christ our Mediator. Prayer is not supposed to be used as a mantra. Subscribing to the false belief that uttering certain prayers by using certain words or catch phrases in a certain order holds the secret of reaping spectacular benefits will make our faith no different from the paganistic understanding of prayer.
This particular prayer is famously known as the Prayer Of Jabez. Books have been written about this prayer. It has been endorsed by many people, taught in many places, and it has spread everywhere. But I personally feel that all the hype surrounding this prayer is uncalled for.
The Prayer Of Jabez probably seemed special because it is found in the middle of the geneology of the family of Judah. I believe people have assigned a lot of value to this prayer because of its simplicity, and also because of its location. The exhilaration of finding such a prayer in such an unlikely place has led people to put undue emphasis on it. Who wouldn’t be pleasantly surprised to find a breath of fresh air in the midst of a book which is as boring as 1 Chronicles? The effect of discovering such a portion of Scriptures is akin to unearthing a treasure chest in the midst of a desert.
However, the question is, as much as the Prayer Of Jabez looks like a special prayer that was recorded in an unexpected place, is the amount of attention given to it justifiable? Have we over-amplified the effect of stumbling upon a couple of verses in the bible, to the extent of misinterpreting the real context in which the prayer was said?
If the Prayer Of Jabez was anything that special, I can unearth many other prayers in the Bible that can be of greater value or significance.
The Lord’s Prayer (Matthew 6:9-13). Isn’t that how Jesus taught us to pray? I’m sure this model prayer is superior to that of Jabez’s prayer. It is a good “mould” or “template” that can be used as a guide to help us to pray.
Check out Jesus’ prayer (John 17:6-26). Imagine the kind of good it will bring to all believers worldwide if everyone were to say this prayer on a daily basis. One may argue that only Jesus could say that prayer, because it was said by Him, and nobody can repeat His prayer and claim it as his own. If that is true, then the same goes for the Prayer Of Jabez, doesn’t it?
What about The Prayer Of Solomon? (1 Kings 3:6-9). At the utterance of that prayer, God gave Solomon a “wise and understanding heart”, and “both riches and honor”, which will be unparalleled by anyone that came before him or will come after him. Solomon was also granted long life. Who wouldn’t want to be blessed like that? Imagine the kinds of books that can be written about this prayer. “Prayer Of Solomon For Adults”. “Prayer Of Solomon For Teens”. “Prayer Of Solomon For Kids”.
Solomon’s father came out with outstanding prayers in the Psalms. David’s prayers have an additional poetic effect to it. His prayers can even be sung along to a tune, for easy memorization. Perhaps a music CD can be made to teach the Prayers Of David to the masses?
How can we overlook the Prayer Of Paul (Ephesians 1:16-19). If only we exemplified the exact prayer that Paul prayed regularly for all the saints. What a great blessing it will be for our brothers and sisters everywhere if we take Paul’s Prayer on par with the Prayer Of Jabez!
Let’s get back to what prayer really is. Prayer is about conversing directly with God, which is made possible by Jesus Christ our Mediator. Prayer is not supposed to be used as a mantra. Subscribing to the false belief that uttering certain prayers by using certain words or catch phrases in a certain order holds the secret of reaping spectacular benefits will make our faith no different from the paganistic understanding of prayer.
Sunday, October 09, 2005
Polygamy In The Bible
Now these were the sons of David… The firstborn was Ammon, by Ahinoam the Jezreelitess; the second, Daniel, by Abigail the Carmelitess; the third, Absalom the son of maacah, the daughter of Talmai… The fourth, Adonijah the son of Haggith; the fifth, Shephatiah, by Abital; the sixth, Ithream, by his wife Eglah. (1 Chronicles 3:1-3).
David had 6 sons born to him by 6 different wives in Hebron. Not only that, he also had more sons born to him in Jerusalem by Bathsheba. Not to mention the sons of his concubines as well.
Doesn’t this raise a serious question about David’s personal life? How can “a man after God’s own heart” have 7 wives in 2 different places and numerous concubines? What does the bible have to say about polygamy?
The fact that David had so many sons by so many wives does not condone polygamy. David had fallen into the ancient custom among kings of marrying the daughters of neighboring kings to create allies.
Negative results followed such multiple marriages. David’s firstborn, Ammon, raped Tamar, his half sister. Ammon’s half brother, Absalom, killed Ammon to avenge for Tamar’s rape. David’s fourth son, Adonijah, tried to usurp the throne from Solomon, who was born to Solomon by Bathsheba. A lot of turbulence and division has resulted from David’s multiple marriages.
Polygamy was not something God has meant for His people, for “a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and they shall become one flesh” (Genesis 2:24). God also gave a principle concerning kings to not “multiply wives for himself, lest his heart turn away” (Deuteronomy 17:17). Call it a shortcoming of David’s human nature. Even though polygamy was an accepted custom throughout the ancient Middle East and among the ancient Israelites, David’s family paid the price for his multiple marriages.
Nevertheless, God did give some level of provision that allowed polygamy to happen under certain conditions. In cases of a childless first marriage, which is known as a levirate marriage, it is permissible for the widow to take another husband. For “her husband’s brother shall go in to her, take her as his wife, and perform the duty of a husband’s brother to her” (Deuteronomy 25:5) in order to carry on the family line of the deceased husband. The Sadducees used the law of the levirate marriage to question Jesus regarding His teaching about the resurrection of the dead (Matthew 22:23-28).
It is said that men have a bigger tendency to be polygamous, or have intentions for polygamous relationships. The concern is not so much about whether or not this statement is politically correct or sexist. The more urgent concern is to heed the dangers and pitfalls of polygamous relationships, be it in married relationships or pre-marital relationships. For God has meant for us to be monogamous, as much as he has meant for marriages to reflect the relationship between Christ and His church – meant for one, and one alone.
David had 6 sons born to him by 6 different wives in Hebron. Not only that, he also had more sons born to him in Jerusalem by Bathsheba. Not to mention the sons of his concubines as well.
Doesn’t this raise a serious question about David’s personal life? How can “a man after God’s own heart” have 7 wives in 2 different places and numerous concubines? What does the bible have to say about polygamy?
The fact that David had so many sons by so many wives does not condone polygamy. David had fallen into the ancient custom among kings of marrying the daughters of neighboring kings to create allies.
Negative results followed such multiple marriages. David’s firstborn, Ammon, raped Tamar, his half sister. Ammon’s half brother, Absalom, killed Ammon to avenge for Tamar’s rape. David’s fourth son, Adonijah, tried to usurp the throne from Solomon, who was born to Solomon by Bathsheba. A lot of turbulence and division has resulted from David’s multiple marriages.
Polygamy was not something God has meant for His people, for “a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and they shall become one flesh” (Genesis 2:24). God also gave a principle concerning kings to not “multiply wives for himself, lest his heart turn away” (Deuteronomy 17:17). Call it a shortcoming of David’s human nature. Even though polygamy was an accepted custom throughout the ancient Middle East and among the ancient Israelites, David’s family paid the price for his multiple marriages.
Nevertheless, God did give some level of provision that allowed polygamy to happen under certain conditions. In cases of a childless first marriage, which is known as a levirate marriage, it is permissible for the widow to take another husband. For “her husband’s brother shall go in to her, take her as his wife, and perform the duty of a husband’s brother to her” (Deuteronomy 25:5) in order to carry on the family line of the deceased husband. The Sadducees used the law of the levirate marriage to question Jesus regarding His teaching about the resurrection of the dead (Matthew 22:23-28).
It is said that men have a bigger tendency to be polygamous, or have intentions for polygamous relationships. The concern is not so much about whether or not this statement is politically correct or sexist. The more urgent concern is to heed the dangers and pitfalls of polygamous relationships, be it in married relationships or pre-marital relationships. For God has meant for us to be monogamous, as much as he has meant for marriages to reflect the relationship between Christ and His church – meant for one, and one alone.
Thursday, October 06, 2005
I Cannot Be Bought!
For you were bought at a price; therefore glorify God in your body and in your spirit, which are God’s (1 Corinthians 6:20).
Yesterday, I got a call from the chairman of a prestigious swimming club in Penang. The Penang Inter-Club competition is 3 month’s away, and she’s already making plans. Her agenda is to beat a rival club to the championship cup. By roping in USM swimmers to swim for her club under the Open Category, she hopes that her club will turn up tops in the state.
Her club has been known for its attempts to entice swimmers with incentives. Being a rich club, it is able to employ foreign coaches to satisfy ambitious parents. It gives luxurious benefits to its swimmers, such as good facilities, free attire, cash incentives, and what nots. The club has also been known for causing riffs when swimmers changed clubs because of what the club is able to offer.
As for us, should we choose to swim for the club, they are offering to sponsor our entry fees. They will give us their attire, pay for the competition’s dinner function, and invited us to a celebration dinner if the club wins the title. Sounds like a very good deal, for them to extend such an invitation us and treat us so well if we will swim under their banner. I’m supposed to relay the message to the USM Swimming Division.
As for me, I personally feel that my allegiance is to my university. It may not be legally wrong to bite at a better offer, but I’ll not let my swimming go to another. I’ve been in Penang all my life, and I’ve never been associated with that club, or felt the need to join it in any way. Therefore, I don’t see why I should strike a connection with that club now, just because it is offering me incentives.
When I stand in my lane, and they call my name, I want it to be known to whom I really belong to. I am Joshua Hooi from USM. That club is a foreigner to me, and I cannot be identified as one of them. If I win, I will win it for USM for no incentive. If I lose, I will only lose the race. I won’t lose my honor or my integrity. I will not be bought over, or be labeled with a price tag.
Some things in this world cannot be bought with money. Things like honor and loyalty.
Being bought at a price brings many implications to the one that has been bought. When we are bought, we do not belong to ourselves anymore. We belong to the one who bought us. Our life and actions will either bring glory or shame to the one who has bought us.
Brothers and sisters, we have been bought with a price. God has set his seal of ownership over us. Our every word and action will either glorify our Father in heaven, or bring shame to His name. Do not trade your allegiance for another, regardless of the tempting bribes that the world may offer. Some things cannot be bought by perishable things such as silver or gold. Our sonship has been bought by the imperishable blood of the Lord Jesus Christ. Therefore, let us “glorify God in your body and in your spirit, which are God’s.”
Let us compete in this race of life under no other banner, but Christ’s alone.
Yesterday, I got a call from the chairman of a prestigious swimming club in Penang. The Penang Inter-Club competition is 3 month’s away, and she’s already making plans. Her agenda is to beat a rival club to the championship cup. By roping in USM swimmers to swim for her club under the Open Category, she hopes that her club will turn up tops in the state.
Her club has been known for its attempts to entice swimmers with incentives. Being a rich club, it is able to employ foreign coaches to satisfy ambitious parents. It gives luxurious benefits to its swimmers, such as good facilities, free attire, cash incentives, and what nots. The club has also been known for causing riffs when swimmers changed clubs because of what the club is able to offer.
As for us, should we choose to swim for the club, they are offering to sponsor our entry fees. They will give us their attire, pay for the competition’s dinner function, and invited us to a celebration dinner if the club wins the title. Sounds like a very good deal, for them to extend such an invitation us and treat us so well if we will swim under their banner. I’m supposed to relay the message to the USM Swimming Division.
As for me, I personally feel that my allegiance is to my university. It may not be legally wrong to bite at a better offer, but I’ll not let my swimming go to another. I’ve been in Penang all my life, and I’ve never been associated with that club, or felt the need to join it in any way. Therefore, I don’t see why I should strike a connection with that club now, just because it is offering me incentives.
When I stand in my lane, and they call my name, I want it to be known to whom I really belong to. I am Joshua Hooi from USM. That club is a foreigner to me, and I cannot be identified as one of them. If I win, I will win it for USM for no incentive. If I lose, I will only lose the race. I won’t lose my honor or my integrity. I will not be bought over, or be labeled with a price tag.
Some things in this world cannot be bought with money. Things like honor and loyalty.
Being bought at a price brings many implications to the one that has been bought. When we are bought, we do not belong to ourselves anymore. We belong to the one who bought us. Our life and actions will either bring glory or shame to the one who has bought us.
Brothers and sisters, we have been bought with a price. God has set his seal of ownership over us. Our every word and action will either glorify our Father in heaven, or bring shame to His name. Do not trade your allegiance for another, regardless of the tempting bribes that the world may offer. Some things cannot be bought by perishable things such as silver or gold. Our sonship has been bought by the imperishable blood of the Lord Jesus Christ. Therefore, let us “glorify God in your body and in your spirit, which are God’s.”
Let us compete in this race of life under no other banner, but Christ’s alone.
Wednesday, October 05, 2005
Stay Away From Ham
The sons of Ham were Cush, Mizraim, Put, and Canaan… Cush begot Nimrod; he began to be a mighty one on the earth… Canaan begot Sidon, his firstborn, and Heth; the Jebusite, the Amorite, and the Girgashite; the Hivite, the Arkite, and the Sinite; the Arvadite, the Zemarite, and the Hamathite (1 Chronicles 1:8-16).
Ham’s lineage does not look like a good one to inherit. The Hamites have suffered severely throughout history. Dispossession of land seemed to be a common occurrence to them.
Let’s look at Ham’s son, Canaan. Canaan was the father of the Jebusites, the Amorites, the Girgashites, the Hivites… All of them were enemies of Israel. The Canaanites were driven out from their land during Joshua’s conquest (Joshua 3:10). It didn’t stop there. During the days of Hezekiah king of Judah, the Simeonites dispossessed the Hamites from Gedor and lived in their broad, quiet and peaceful land which had rich, good pasture for their flocks (1 Chronicles 4:39-41).
Not only did the Hamites suffered great persecution. Ham’s lineage also became a source of problems to God’s people.
Let’s look at Ham’s grandson, Nimrod. After Noah’s flood, Nimrod became “a mighty one on the earth” by becoming a source of great evil on the earth. He was the husband of a beautiful witch named Semiramis, who was the Queen of Babylon. Historically, he was called the husband of his mother. The both of them created a satanic cult so powerful that it spread around the world. Nimrod was called by many names, including Moloch. Babies were sacrificed in his honor. After Nimrod was put to death, Semiramis gave girth to another child and claimed that Nimrod had been reincarnated. The child was called Tammuz, and he became the sun god, Baal.
What did Ham do to deserve such an accursed lineage? A dig into his past proved to get even more interesting.
And Ham, the father of Canaan, saw the nakedness of his father, and told his two brothers outside… So Noah awoke from his wine, and knew what his younger son had done to him. Then he said: “Cursed be Canaan; A servant of servants he shall be to his brethren.” (Genesis 9:22-25)
Apparently, there was a time when Ham saw his father, Noah, lying naked and unconscious in his tent. He went outside to tell his brothers, Ham and Japheth. Ham probably made fun of his father, and described what he saw in a disrespectful way by making a spectacle out of it. Ham’s offense resulted in a curse that affected his lineage, and even world history. Some believed that the African peoples were allegedly descended from Canaan, and this justified their slavery.
This incident just goes to show that we should be careful of the things that we do or say, although they may seem funny at that time. We may not be aware of how our careless sins may have serious repercussions at a later point of time.
On a lighter note, probably this incident also inspired the food industry to name a certain meat product after that particular son of Noah. Stay healthy, and keep away from ham!
Ham’s lineage does not look like a good one to inherit. The Hamites have suffered severely throughout history. Dispossession of land seemed to be a common occurrence to them.
Let’s look at Ham’s son, Canaan. Canaan was the father of the Jebusites, the Amorites, the Girgashites, the Hivites… All of them were enemies of Israel. The Canaanites were driven out from their land during Joshua’s conquest (Joshua 3:10). It didn’t stop there. During the days of Hezekiah king of Judah, the Simeonites dispossessed the Hamites from Gedor and lived in their broad, quiet and peaceful land which had rich, good pasture for their flocks (1 Chronicles 4:39-41).
Not only did the Hamites suffered great persecution. Ham’s lineage also became a source of problems to God’s people.
Let’s look at Ham’s grandson, Nimrod. After Noah’s flood, Nimrod became “a mighty one on the earth” by becoming a source of great evil on the earth. He was the husband of a beautiful witch named Semiramis, who was the Queen of Babylon. Historically, he was called the husband of his mother. The both of them created a satanic cult so powerful that it spread around the world. Nimrod was called by many names, including Moloch. Babies were sacrificed in his honor. After Nimrod was put to death, Semiramis gave girth to another child and claimed that Nimrod had been reincarnated. The child was called Tammuz, and he became the sun god, Baal.
What did Ham do to deserve such an accursed lineage? A dig into his past proved to get even more interesting.
And Ham, the father of Canaan, saw the nakedness of his father, and told his two brothers outside… So Noah awoke from his wine, and knew what his younger son had done to him. Then he said: “Cursed be Canaan; A servant of servants he shall be to his brethren.” (Genesis 9:22-25)
Apparently, there was a time when Ham saw his father, Noah, lying naked and unconscious in his tent. He went outside to tell his brothers, Ham and Japheth. Ham probably made fun of his father, and described what he saw in a disrespectful way by making a spectacle out of it. Ham’s offense resulted in a curse that affected his lineage, and even world history. Some believed that the African peoples were allegedly descended from Canaan, and this justified their slavery.
This incident just goes to show that we should be careful of the things that we do or say, although they may seem funny at that time. We may not be aware of how our careless sins may have serious repercussions at a later point of time.
On a lighter note, probably this incident also inspired the food industry to name a certain meat product after that particular son of Noah. Stay healthy, and keep away from ham!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
